top of page

Show more03:02Decision-Making in Pediatric OCD: Evidence Accumulation and Caution in a Two Alternative Forced Choice Task

Yazarın fotoğrafı: Yanki Yazgan
Yanki Yazgan
10 Nis 2019
1 dakikada okunur

Güncelleme tarihi: 7 Mar

Abstract

Background: Decision-making in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder has typically been investigated in the adult population.Computational approaches have recently started to get integrated into these studies. However, decision-making research in pediatric OCD populations is scarce. Methods: We investigated latent decision processes in 21 medication-free pediatric OCD patients and 23 healthy control participants.We hypothesized that OCD patients would be more cautious and less efficient in evidence accumulation than controls in a two alternative forced choice (2AFC) task. Results: Pediatric OCD patients were less efficient than controls in accumulating perceptual evidence and showed a tendency to be more cautious. In comparison to post-correct decisions, OCD patients increased decision thresholds after erroneous decisions, whereas healthy controls decreased decision thresholds. These changes were coupled with weaker evidence accumulation after errors in both groups. Limitations: The small sample size limited the power of the study. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate poorer decision-making performance in pediatric OCD patients at the level of latent processes, specifically in terms of evidence accumulation.

Keywords: Decision making, Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Model, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Children

Son Yazılar

Hepsini Gör
Eyyy Z Kuşağı!

Tam elli yıl önce, henüz Kuğulu Park kavşağı bile yapılmamışken, Ankara’da gençliğe adım atmış bir yatılı lise öğrencisi olarak bugünün gençleri için anlamlı neler söyleyebilirim? Şöyle, kuşak farklar

 
 
 

Yorumlar


bottom of page